Trump to Appeal 'Unconstitutional Gag Order' as Judge Calls it a 'Sham,' Threatens Jail Time

Trump to Appeal ‘Unconstitutional Gag Order’ as Judge Calls it a ‘Sham,’ Threatens Jail Time

Former President Trump announced on Thursday that his defence team in the NY v. Trump case has filed an appeal to challenge the “unconstitutional gag order” placed on him. This order restricts what he can publicly say about the case.

“I wanted to inform you that we recently submitted an important request to the appellate division. This request is about a gag order that we believe is completely unconstitutional. The gag order prevents me from discussing any important matters related to the case with you.” There are also many positive developments happening with the case. “He said it should not have been filed,”

Trump has been ordered not to publicly discuss witnesses or their potential involvement in the case. He is also not allowed to talk about court staff, district attorney staff, or their family members. In this case, a judge determined that Trump violated the order 10 times and imposed a fine of $10,000 on him. The judge also stated that Trump could be imprisoned if he continues to violate the order.

On Thursday, Trump also shared with reporters the opinions of lawyers about the case. On that day, lawyers such as Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley expressed their criticism of the trial.

“This case is similar to Frankenstein. A federal felony that was previously claimed was connected to a minor offence that had been resolved, but then it was revived suddenly. Trump said that many of us were surprised to see this person enter the court because it’s a crime that none of us have witnessed before. He quoted Turley from Fox News.

As someone with 60 years of experience in this field, I am not aware of the specific crime he has been charged with. This is difficult for everyone to understand. I am confused about the crime. There is no evidence to support any crime. “This is not true,” Trump continued, quoting Dershowitz.

Stormy Daniels, a former pornographic actress, testified in court on Tuesday about her alleged affair with Donald Trump when he was a real estate mogul. She will be returning to court in Manhattan on Thursday.

Daniels said in court that she met Trump at a celebrity golf event in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, in 2006. She claimed that they engaged in sexual activity in a hotel room owned by Trump during the event. Trump has publicly denied this multiple times. Daniels also explained to the court that she started working in the pornography industry after being an exotic dancer as a teenager.

The case revolves around business records that were supposedly falsified. According to authorities, Michael Cohen, who was previously employed as Donald Trump’s lawyer, gave $130,000 to Daniels in order to prevent her from discussing the alleged extramarital affair. According to prosecutors, the Trump Organisation reimbursed Cohen and incorrectly documented the payments as legal fees. Now, they are attempting to demonstrate that Trump made false statements on official documents with the purpose of committing or concealing another crime, which is a serious offence.

Legal experts on social media said that Daniels’ statement on Tuesday was unrelated to the case and should not have been made public.

“I used to have a job as a judge.” I still have a good understanding of which evidence is relevant, which evidence is unfair, and which evidence is not allowed because it goes too far. The decisions made by the judge in today’s Trump trial in New York City will be remembered by people as a troubling mark on our justice system, reminding us of corrupt dictatorships. “David Friedman wrote on X that he is disappointed with the prosecution for undermining our legal system.” Friedman is a lawyer who served as the U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Trump administration.

After Daniels’ statement on Tuesday, Trump’s defence team requested a mistrial, but Judge Juan Merchan denied their request.

“The prosecution has gone too far; there is no case.” “MISSAL!” On Tuesday, Trump posted on Truth Social.

“This investigation is based on inaccurate information from the past that emerged during the 2016 Presidential Election.” The main focus here is to support Crooked Joe Biden’s election campaign, as he is unable to achieve it independently. Alvin Bragg, who is supported by George Soros, is launching a harsh attack on Biden’s political opponent, which is me. He is closely collaborating with the D.A. and the White House. It is illegal, goes against the Constitution, and is characteristic of underdeveloped countries!


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *